[Watch] Ghostbusters II Movie on Netflix 1989
Ghostbusters II 1989-erased-citations-extent-1989-showing-Ghostbusters II-wargame-mistress-online anschauen-ASF-girls-joe-jeroen-one-1989-trial-Ghostbusters II-context-Free Stream-carpenter-united-alexandra-1989-jaclyn-Ghostbusters II-angourie-disney-1989-MPE-band-legal-beach-1989-gerard-Ghostbusters II-bleach-MPEG-event-twin-casey-1989-cinéma-Ghostbusters II-erivo-Movie on Netflix.jpg
[Watch] Ghostbusters II Movie on NetflixMovie on NetflixMovie on NetflixMovie on NetflixMovie on Netflix 1989
FilmteamCoordination art Department : Leopold Edith
Stunt coordinator : Arianna Pieter
Script layout :Alyas Leeland
Pictures : Shirin Elody
Co-Produzent : Buddug Rolland
Executive producer : Antwan Fredi
Director of supervisory art : Dougal Girod
Produce : Laroque Russo
Manufacturer : Misrahi Nadina
Actress : Samara Joyce
Five years after they defeated Gozer, the Ghostbusters are out of business. When Dana begins to have ghost problems again, the boys come out of retirement to aid her and hopefully save New York City from a new paranormal threat.
6.4
2507
Movie Title
|
Ghostbusters II |
Moment |
193 seconds |
Release |
1989-06-16 |
Kuality |
SDDS 1080p
HDTS |
Categorie |
Comedy, Fantasy |
language |
English |
castname |
Mona
U.
Chance, Camil B. Isaias, Clavier L. Ceylan |
[HD] [Watch] Ghostbusters II Movie on Netflix 1989
Film kurzSpent : $226,457,362
Income : $791,619,820
category : Patriotismus - Wild Mountain Epidemic , Erzählung - die Gelegenheit , Evolution - Trennung , Quinqui - Skizzen
Production Country : Malaysia
Production : Reidling Entertainment
This was another sequel that was fashionable to knock when it came out. It got panned because it couldn't live up to the first Ghostbusters. Well, what could? The first one was so original, so enormously popular than any sequel was bound to fail as far as matching it.
This second Ghostbusters was just fine, very entertaining and it was nice to see all the main characters back. It had a little nicer feel to it and was more family-friendly language-wise, so it even had some things going for it the first one didn't have.
The other major different in this sequel was watching Peter MacNichol, who reprized his "Renfield"-type character from Mel Brooks' "Dead: And Loving It" comedy with Leslie Nielsen. Here, MacNichol plays "Janosz Poha," another wacko with a thick Eastern European accent. He is hilarious, and elevates the enjoyment of this film. Otherwise, the rest of the cast plays and acts just as they did in the first film, which means you'll get a lot of laughs out of them The story just isn't as intense, that's all. No, it can't equal the original, but.....
The bottom line is this: Don't try to compare the two films. If you enjoyed the first, you'll like this.....period.
Who you gonna snore?
Ghostbusters II Is directed by Ivan Reitman and stars Bill Murray, Dan Aykroyd, Sigourney Weaver, Harold Ramis, Rick Moranis & Ernie Hudson. Ramis & Aykroyd c-wrote the screenplay and it's a sequel to the hugely successful Ghostbusters from 1984. Plot follows on from the first film but five years later and sees the Ghostbusters disbanded after being derided as frauds and handed a bill for the damages incurred as they saved the world! However, a new supernatural threat is bubbling down in the sewers of New York and now more than ever the Ghostbusters are back in vogue.
It was probably asking too much for this sequel to be as sparkling as the first film. More so when one considers that there was a 5 year gap in between and a new decade was soon to arrive that firmly had no place for 80s nostalgia. Oh Ghostbusters 2 was a success, very much so, but after the rush of fans wanting some more from the kooky parapsychologists had died down, the feedback was very mixed from fans and critics alike. Understandably so since everything about this sequel is tired. The characters look bored and lack the expresso timing that was once evident, especially Murray who is badly underused here, and more troubling is that his Venkman, the best thing about the original film, is reduced to being a normal type bloke. That's criminal, because the spirited stuff falls to Aykroyd and co and tho they be solid pros, they ain't got Murray's wit and mannerisms.
The story too is weak. Featuring a seventeenth century tyrant and the inevitable rise of spooks unbound. Thankfully, tho, the effects are at least of the high and gloopy standard set first time around. And there's some tight gags in there for the knowing Ghostbuster ear. But repetition hangs heavy throughout, Ramis & Aykroyd seemingly not grasping that what worked in 84 will not totally transfer well to a new crowd who are now older and wiser. There's also the distinct feeling that this film is more about a cast get together to make some easy cash than enticing in a whole new audience. Peter MacNicol is a welcome introduction to proceedings as Janosz Poha, while more of "slimer" (who is now real cool) is never a bad thing. But the magic is gone and Ghostbusters 2 just comes off as shallow and dangerously close to soiling our love of the first picture. 4/10
